<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 276 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166748</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal filed on 9-5-1983 was incompetent due to non-compliance with Section 35E provisions and deemed infrectuous. The subsequent appeal filed on 3-11-1983 was considered newly filed and would proceed with a new number. The matter was scheduled for an early hearing due to the significant monetary involvement, with the Tribunal emphasizing the mandatory nature of compliance with Section 35E.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 10:55:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=368041" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 276 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166748</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the appeal filed on 9-5-1983 was incompetent due to non-compliance with Section 35E provisions and deemed infrectuous. The subsequent appeal filed on 3-11-1983 was considered newly filed and would proceed with a new number. The matter was scheduled for an early hearing due to the significant monetary involvement, with the Tribunal emphasizing the mandatory nature of compliance with Section 35E.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166748</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>