https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166735 The Tribunal held that the 4-harness Drill met the conditions of proviso (v) by conforming to the 1964 Order's definition of Drill and having no specified maximum ex-factory price, entitling the respondents to the concession. The impugned order was deemed correct, and the show cause notice was discharged. en-us Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 10:52:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166735 The Tribunal held that the 4-harness Drill met the conditions of proviso (v) by conforming to the 1964 Order's definition of Drill and having no specified maximum ex-factory price, entitling the respondents to the concession. The impugned order was deemed correct, and the show cause notice was discharged. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 07 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166735