https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166723 The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under Item 22F for countervailing duty levy, rejecting the appellant's arguments based on asbestos content percentages. The Tribunal found that the goods, described as "Beater addition asbestos jointings," containing significant asbestos percentages, fell within the scope of Item 22F. It determined that the subsequent amendment did not alter the original entry's interpretation, citing a Supreme Court precedent on classification. The Tribunal affirmed the Appellate Collector's orders, denying the appeals and confirming the levy of countervailing duty under Item 22F. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Nov 2014 15:48:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166723 The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported goods under Item 22F for countervailing duty levy, rejecting the appellant's arguments based on asbestos content percentages. The Tribunal found that the goods, described as "Beater addition asbestos jointings," containing significant asbestos percentages, fell within the scope of Item 22F. It determined that the subsequent amendment did not alter the original entry's interpretation, citing a Supreme Court precedent on classification. The Tribunal affirmed the Appellate Collector's orders, denying the appeals and confirming the levy of countervailing duty under Item 22F. Case-Laws Customs Thu, 03 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166723