<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 105 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252788</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue against the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars was not justified as there was no deliberate intention by the assessee. Emphasizing the need for specific conditions to initiate penalty proceedings, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee due to the absence of a clear direction in the assessment order, rendering the penalty proceedings invalid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 105 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252788</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue against the Commissioner&#039;s decision to set aside the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act. The Court found that the penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars was not justified as there was no deliberate intention by the assessee. Emphasizing the need for specific conditions to initiate penalty proceedings, the Court ruled in favor of the assessee due to the absence of a clear direction in the assessment order, rendering the penalty proceedings invalid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>