<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 92 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252775</link>
    <description>Advance against depreciation was treated as an amount received in advance and adjustable against future depreciation, with an obligation attached from inception rather than a reserve created out of profits. On that basis, it was regarded as a timing difference and not taxable as income under the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act. The Supreme Court&#039;s characterisation of the amount was applied to the regular assessment as well, and the amount could not be added to the assessee&#039;s income in computation under section 143(3).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 92 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252775</link>
      <description>Advance against depreciation was treated as an amount received in advance and adjustable against future depreciation, with an obligation attached from inception rather than a reserve created out of profits. On that basis, it was regarded as a timing difference and not taxable as income under the regular provisions of the Income-tax Act. The Supreme Court&#039;s characterisation of the amount was applied to the regular assessment as well, and the amount could not be added to the assessee&#039;s income in computation under section 143(3).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252775</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>