<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252773</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, directing the deletion of penalties on interest disallowance and loan receipt assessed u/s 68. Emphasizing the independence of penalty proceedings from assessments, it recognized the commercial expediency of the actions and the reasonableness of explanations provided. The Tribunal found no justification for penalties solely based on agreeing to the assessment of the loan amount as income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2014 06:04:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367978" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 90 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252773</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for AY 2006-07 and AY 2007-08, directing the deletion of penalties on interest disallowance and loan receipt assessed u/s 68. Emphasizing the independence of penalty proceedings from assessments, it recognized the commercial expediency of the actions and the reasonableness of explanations provided. The Tribunal found no justification for penalties solely based on agreeing to the assessment of the loan amount as income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252773</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>