<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 85 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252768</link>
    <description>The appellant was facing a demand for service tax amounting to Rs. 2,26,86,780 for technical testing and analysis services received from foreign companies. The revenue claimed the appellant was liable for the tax, along with interest and penalty. The appellant argued that a previous Tribunal order supported their position, leading to a prima facie case for a complete waiver. The Additional Commissioner contended the services were partly performed abroad, citing a different case, but lacked clear findings on the relevant rules. Ultimately, the requirement for predeposit was waived, and a stay against recovery was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367963" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 85 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252768</link>
      <description>The appellant was facing a demand for service tax amounting to Rs. 2,26,86,780 for technical testing and analysis services received from foreign companies. The revenue claimed the appellant was liable for the tax, along with interest and penalty. The appellant argued that a previous Tribunal order supported their position, leading to a prima facie case for a complete waiver. The Additional Commissioner contended the services were partly performed abroad, citing a different case, but lacked clear findings on the relevant rules. Ultimately, the requirement for predeposit was waived, and a stay against recovery was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252768</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>