https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252766 The Commissioner had jurisdiction to adjudicate the service tax matter for renting immovable property. A previous decision cited was deemed inapplicable due to differences. The appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the tax amount with interest and provide a Solvency Certificate. The court emphasized the need for a prima facie case and highlighted the agreement between the service provider and receiver as crucial. The appellant was directed to comply with deposit requirements within a specified timeline, with a stay against recovery granted during the appeal. en-us Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252766 The Commissioner had jurisdiction to adjudicate the service tax matter for renting immovable property. A previous decision cited was deemed inapplicable due to differences. The appellant was directed to deposit 50% of the tax amount with interest and provide a Solvency Certificate. The court emphasized the need for a prima facie case and highlighted the agreement between the service provider and receiver as crucial. The appellant was directed to comply with deposit requirements within a specified timeline, with a stay against recovery granted during the appeal. Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 17 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252766