<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 79 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252762</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the benefit of Sr. No. 12 of Notification No. 14/2002-CE is admissible to the appellants, considering the fabrics as &#039;deemed duty paid&#039; under Explanation-II. The Tribunal emphasized that any other interpretation would render Explanation-II redundant and lead to absurd results, contrary to the legislative intent. The reference was answered in favor of the appellants, and the appeal files were listed for disposal before the regular bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2015 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367956" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 79 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252762</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the benefit of Sr. No. 12 of Notification No. 14/2002-CE is admissible to the appellants, considering the fabrics as &#039;deemed duty paid&#039; under Explanation-II. The Tribunal emphasized that any other interpretation would render Explanation-II redundant and lead to absurd results, contrary to the legislative intent. The reference was answered in favor of the appellants, and the appeal files were listed for disposal before the regular bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252762</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>