<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 75 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252758</link>
    <description>The appeals filed by the appellants against the OIO passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs were rejected by the court. The case, primarily relying on recovered note books detailing financial transactions, production data, and deliveries, led to duty demands on the appellants. Despite arguments challenging the reliability of the note books and seeking cenvat credit and exemption, the judge found the explanations unconvincing. The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, emphasizing the evidence presented and the confirmation of note book entries by suppliers. The appeals were dismissed on October 31, 2014.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 12:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367952" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 75 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252758</link>
      <description>The appeals filed by the appellants against the OIO passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs were rejected by the court. The case, primarily relying on recovered note books detailing financial transactions, production data, and deliveries, led to duty demands on the appellants. Despite arguments challenging the reliability of the note books and seeking cenvat credit and exemption, the judge found the explanations unconvincing. The court upheld the adjudicating authority&#039;s order, emphasizing the evidence presented and the confirmation of note book entries by suppliers. The appeals were dismissed on October 31, 2014.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>