<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252747</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal based on the CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014, which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals. The tribunal upheld the principle that such instructions apply to pending cases to reduce unnecessary litigation where the tax effect is minimal. The decision aligns with the broader judicial consensus on the applicability of CBDT instructions to both prospective and retrospective cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2014 06:07:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367931" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 64 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252747</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal based on the CBDT Instruction No. 5/2014, which sets a monetary limit for filing appeals. The tribunal upheld the principle that such instructions apply to pending cases to reduce unnecessary litigation where the tax effect is minimal. The decision aligns with the broader judicial consensus on the applicability of CBDT instructions to both prospective and retrospective cases.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>