<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 56 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252739</link>
    <description>The court clarified that the Assessing Officer can assess income not initially included in the reassessment notice under Explanation 3 to section 147 of the Income-tax Act. Emphasizing the empowering provision, the court upheld the validity of proceedings under section 147/148, rejecting claims of vitiation. The judgment set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision favoring the assessee on the assessment of escaped income during reassessment, remanding for fresh adjudication. It underscored the importance of legal precedents and Explanation 3 in guiding such assessments, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 17:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367923" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 56 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252739</link>
      <description>The court clarified that the Assessing Officer can assess income not initially included in the reassessment notice under Explanation 3 to section 147 of the Income-tax Act. Emphasizing the empowering provision, the court upheld the validity of proceedings under section 147/148, rejecting claims of vitiation. The judgment set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision favoring the assessee on the assessment of escaped income during reassessment, remanding for fresh adjudication. It underscored the importance of legal precedents and Explanation 3 in guiding such assessments, ultimately ruling in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252739</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>