<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252738</link>
    <description>Whether interest on borrowed funds invested in shares and debentures is deductible as business expenditure under s. 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act was the dominant issue. The HC held that the only requirement for deduction is that the capital was borrowed and utilised for business purposes in the relevant year; it is immaterial whether the borrowing was used to acquire a capital or revenue asset, and interest remains deductible even where an investment company borrows to acquire shares held as investments, stock-in-trade, or for obtaining controlling interest. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of the interest deduction was upheld and the appeal was decided against the revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 16:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367922" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 55 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252738</link>
      <description>Whether interest on borrowed funds invested in shares and debentures is deductible as business expenditure under s. 36(1)(iii) of the Income-tax Act was the dominant issue. The HC held that the only requirement for deduction is that the capital was borrowed and utilised for business purposes in the relevant year; it is immaterial whether the borrowing was used to acquire a capital or revenue asset, and interest remains deductible even where an investment company borrows to acquire shares held as investments, stock-in-trade, or for obtaining controlling interest. Consequently, the Tribunal&#039;s allowance of the interest deduction was upheld and the appeal was decided against the revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252738</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>