<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (11) TMI 278 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166712</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the ground of the time-barred show cause notice, holding that the notice was issued after the six-month limit under Section 35A(3)(b). The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding the vagueness of the notice and denial of natural justice, focusing solely on the time limitation issue. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and procedural requirements in administrative actions, emphasizing the strict application of time limits in legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 11:17:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (11) TMI 278 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166712</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal on the ground of the time-barred show cause notice, holding that the notice was issued after the six-month limit under Section 35A(3)(b). The Tribunal rejected arguments regarding the vagueness of the notice and denial of natural justice, focusing solely on the time limitation issue. The judgment underscores the significance of adhering to statutory provisions and procedural requirements in administrative actions, emphasizing the strict application of time limits in legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166712</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>