<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252700</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the company, holding that administrative expenses were only applicable to the community center and not the residential quarters as misinterpreted from the meeting minutes. The Court clarified that no income accrued for the residential quarters if the Government did not agree to pay overhead expenses, leading to the deletion of the added amount of Rs. 35,57,615.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 06:26:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 17 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252700</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the company, holding that administrative expenses were only applicable to the community center and not the residential quarters as misinterpreted from the meeting minutes. The Court clarified that no income accrued for the residential quarters if the Government did not agree to pay overhead expenses, leading to the deletion of the added amount of Rs. 35,57,615.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252700</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>