<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 2 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252685</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upheld the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, and quashed the reassessment proceedings. The additions made by the AO were deleted as the Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper evidence over suspicion. The Tribunal highlighted the invalidity of multiple assessments for the same year and stressed the significance of correct service of notice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 06:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367827" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 2 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252685</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upheld the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, and quashed the reassessment proceedings. The additions made by the AO were deleted as the Tribunal emphasized the importance of proper evidence over suspicion. The Tribunal highlighted the invalidity of multiple assessments for the same year and stressed the significance of correct service of notice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252685</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>