<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (11) TMI 1 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252684</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act applies to both amounts paid and payable, contrary to the Special Bench decision. The assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) by lower authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the Special Leave Petition does not establish binding precedent. The judgment was pronounced on October 17, 2014, confirming the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2014 06:25:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367826" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (11) TMI 1 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252684</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act applies to both amounts paid and payable, contrary to the Special Bench decision. The assessee&#039;s appeals were dismissed, affirming the disallowance under section 40(a)(ia) by lower authorities. The Tribunal emphasized that the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of the Special Leave Petition does not establish binding precedent. The judgment was pronounced on October 17, 2014, confirming the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252684</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>