<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1982 (12) TMI 217 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166707</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the Government acted fairly in implementing the Import Policy. The petitioners&#039; claims of unfair treatment and procedural lapses were unfounded, with the court finding that the Government&#039;s decisions were justified based on technical advice. The court concluded that the petitioners&#039; actions were aimed at preventing competition rather than genuine concerns, leading to the dismissal of the petition with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 17:39:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367822" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1982 (12) TMI 217 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166707</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition, ruling that the Government acted fairly in implementing the Import Policy. The petitioners&#039; claims of unfair treatment and procedural lapses were unfounded, with the court finding that the Government&#039;s decisions were justified based on technical advice. The court concluded that the petitioners&#039; actions were aimed at preventing competition rather than genuine concerns, leading to the dismissal of the petition with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 1982 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166707</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>