<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (2) TMI 853 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166693</link>
    <description>The High Court disposed of the writ petitions, emphasizing that the civil court should adjudicate the factual disputes and pass any necessary interlocutory orders. The District Court was directed to consider any applications for interim orders independently.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 12:40:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367791" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (2) TMI 853 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166693</link>
      <description>The High Court disposed of the writ petitions, emphasizing that the civil court should adjudicate the factual disputes and pass any necessary interlocutory orders. The District Court was directed to consider any applications for interim orders independently.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166693</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>