https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252666 The Tribunal found that the appellants mis-declared imported DWDM equipment and software to evade customs duty. It was determined that the software was embedded in the hardware, and financial hardship claims were dismissed. Penalties were imposed on various parties involved, with pre-deposits required based on their roles and severity of actions. The Tribunal ordered the differential duty to be deposited within twelve weeks and specified pre-deposit amounts for penalties. Compliance and reporting instructions were provided, and stay applications were disposed of accordingly. en-us Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 31 Oct 2014 11:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252666 The Tribunal found that the appellants mis-declared imported DWDM equipment and software to evade customs duty. It was determined that the software was embedded in the hardware, and financial hardship claims were dismissed. Penalties were imposed on various parties involved, with pre-deposits required based on their roles and severity of actions. The Tribunal ordered the differential duty to be deposited within twelve weeks and specified pre-deposit amounts for penalties. Compliance and reporting instructions were provided, and stay applications were disposed of accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 20 Jan 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252666