<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 799 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the importing firm by reducing the penalty imposed on them. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 8th May 2014 by Anil Choudhary, J.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2014 12:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367769" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 799 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal of the importing firm by reducing the penalty imposed on them. The appeals of the Revenue were dismissed, and the judgment was pronounced on 8th May 2014 by Anil Choudhary, J.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>