<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 784 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252650</link>
    <description>The Tax Appeal partly succeeded as the Court upheld the deduction of depreciation under Section 115JA despite a change in method and ruled that interest charges under sections 234B and 234C apply to companies under MAT provisions. The Court&#039;s decision was influenced by precedents and interpretations of the Income Tax Act, ultimately deciding against the Department on the first issue and in favor of the Department on the second issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 07:51:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367745" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 784 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252650</link>
      <description>The Tax Appeal partly succeeded as the Court upheld the deduction of depreciation under Section 115JA despite a change in method and ruled that interest charges under sections 234B and 234C apply to companies under MAT provisions. The Court&#039;s decision was influenced by precedents and interpretations of the Income Tax Act, ultimately deciding against the Department on the first issue and in favor of the Department on the second issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>