<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (9) TMI 284 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166671</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that crushing waste rubber into powder did not amount to manufacturing under Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs regulations. Despite the change in physical form, the original characteristics and chemical identity of the substance remained unchanged. As there was no chemical reaction or reformation, the Tribunal concluded that the process did not create a new product. Consequently, the demand for duty was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed without further consideration of other arguments raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 14:24:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (9) TMI 284 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166671</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that crushing waste rubber into powder did not amount to manufacturing under Central Excise &amp;amp; Customs regulations. Despite the change in physical form, the original characteristics and chemical identity of the substance remained unchanged. As there was no chemical reaction or reformation, the Tribunal concluded that the process did not create a new product. Consequently, the demand for duty was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal was allowed without further consideration of other arguments raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166671</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>