<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (10) TMI 241 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166665</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that the recovery of Caprolactum from wash water constituted manufacture, with only the Caprolactum recovered from depolymerization of oligomers being liable to duty. The show cause notice for review was deemed valid, and the matter was remanded for quantification of the manufactured Caprolactum. Duty was to be levied solely on the Caprolactum derived from the depolymerization process, partially succeeding in the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 12:19:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367704" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (10) TMI 241 - CEGAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166665</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that the recovery of Caprolactum from wash water constituted manufacture, with only the Caprolactum recovered from depolymerization of oligomers being liable to duty. The show cause notice for review was deemed valid, and the matter was remanded for quantification of the manufactured Caprolactum. Duty was to be levied solely on the Caprolactum derived from the depolymerization process, partially succeeding in the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166665</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>