https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252633 The tribunal found that the appellant's provision of hostel facility and canteen services to employees did not solely constitute business support service or out-door catering services for service tax liability. The demand for service tax for the period from 2006-07 to March 2012 was partially sustained, with the tribunal directing a specific deposit for appeal proceedings. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit of remaining dues, granting a stay against recovery during the appeal. Compliance with the deposit was crucial for the appeal's continuation, ensuring procedural fairness and facilitating the process effectively. en-us Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252633 The tribunal found that the appellant's provision of hostel facility and canteen services to employees did not solely constitute business support service or out-door catering services for service tax liability. The demand for service tax for the period from 2006-07 to March 2012 was partially sustained, with the tribunal directing a specific deposit for appeal proceedings. The tribunal waived the pre-deposit of remaining dues, granting a stay against recovery during the appeal. Compliance with the deposit was crucial for the appeal's continuation, ensuring procedural fairness and facilitating the process effectively. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 25 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252633