<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 744 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252610</link>
    <description>Ship-breaking activity is treated as production for deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I because dismantling a ship yields distinct articles. The analysis applies the Supreme Court&#039;s distinction between &quot;production&quot; and &quot;manufacture&quot;, under which production has a broader meaning and need not result in an entirely new product. Since the statutory language refers to &quot;produce&quot; without requiring that the output be new, articles obtained through ship breaking satisfy the production requirement. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s ship-breaking operations were eligible for the claimed deductions, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:20:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 744 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252610</link>
      <description>Ship-breaking activity is treated as production for deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I because dismantling a ship yields distinct articles. The analysis applies the Supreme Court&#039;s distinction between &quot;production&quot; and &quot;manufacture&quot;, under which production has a broader meaning and need not result in an entirely new product. Since the statutory language refers to &quot;produce&quot; without requiring that the output be new, articles obtained through ship breaking satisfy the production requirement. On that basis, the assessee&#039;s ship-breaking operations were eligible for the claimed deductions, and the revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252610</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>