<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 742 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252608</link>
    <description>The Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of the revenue Department in a case concerning the interpretation of Section 80HHC. The Court held that unabsorbed business losses of earlier years should be set off before determining business profits for deduction under Section 80HHC. This decision was influenced by the precedent set in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Shirke Construction Equipment Ltd. The Court&#039;s ruling favored the Department, quashing the ITAT&#039;s judgment, making the eligibility of a firm engaged in manufacturing detergent powder for deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I a secondary issue in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2014 06:20:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367629" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 742 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252608</link>
      <description>The Gujarat High Court ruled in favor of the revenue Department in a case concerning the interpretation of Section 80HHC. The Court held that unabsorbed business losses of earlier years should be set off before determining business profits for deduction under Section 80HHC. This decision was influenced by the precedent set in the case of Commissioner of Income-Tax vs. Shirke Construction Equipment Ltd. The Court&#039;s ruling favored the Department, quashing the ITAT&#039;s judgment, making the eligibility of a firm engaged in manufacturing detergent powder for deductions under sections 80HH and 80-I a secondary issue in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>