https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252594 The tribunal found that the denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant due to the absence of the service provider's registration number on the invoices was unfounded. Despite the missing registration number, the service provider had paid the service tax as evidenced by the S.T. 3 return. The tribunal considered this a rectifiable defect and allowed the appeal, setting aside the original order. Both the stay petition and the appeal were disposed of in favor of the appellant. en-us Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:21:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252594 The tribunal found that the denial of Cenvat credit to the appellant due to the absence of the service provider's registration number on the invoices was unfounded. Despite the missing registration number, the service provider had paid the service tax as evidenced by the S.T. 3 return. The tribunal considered this a rectifiable defect and allowed the appeal, setting aside the original order. Both the stay petition and the appeal were disposed of in favor of the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252594