<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 721 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252587</link>
    <description>The court held that the revision application under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act was maintainable and should not have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by the Central Government. The impugned order was quashed, and the application was restored for fresh consideration on merits. The court directed a new order to be passed without influence from previous conclusions. The petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2015 11:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367582" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 721 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252587</link>
      <description>The court held that the revision application under Section 35EE of the Central Excise Act was maintainable and should not have been dismissed for lack of jurisdiction by the Central Government. The impugned order was quashed, and the application was restored for fresh consideration on merits. The court directed a new order to be passed without influence from previous conclusions. The petition was disposed of with no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252587</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>