<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 720 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252586</link>
    <description>Cumulative circumstantial evidence, including excess stock, mismatched inputs and finished goods, and missing statutory entries, was treated as sufficient to establish clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods, so the duty demand and related liability were upheld. MODVAT credit was not allowed to be retained for alleged process loss and wastage because the claimed wastage and packing consumption were not properly reflected in the statutory records or timely disclosed to the department, so reversal of credit was sustained. Once clandestine removal was proved, the penalties on the company and connected persons were also maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2015 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 720 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252586</link>
      <description>Cumulative circumstantial evidence, including excess stock, mismatched inputs and finished goods, and missing statutory entries, was treated as sufficient to establish clandestine manufacture and removal of excisable goods, so the duty demand and related liability were upheld. MODVAT credit was not allowed to be retained for alleged process loss and wastage because the claimed wastage and packing consumption were not properly reflected in the statutory records or timely disclosed to the department, so reversal of credit was sustained. Once clandestine removal was proved, the penalties on the company and connected persons were also maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252586</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>