<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 709 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252575</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the gross profit rate calculation covered expenses adequately, eliminating the need for invoking Section 40A(3) for disallowances. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary judgment legally sound, with no substantial questions of law requiring further review.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:34:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 709 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252575</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal&#039;s order under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It upheld the ITAT&#039;s decision that the gross profit rate calculation covered expenses adequately, eliminating the need for invoking Section 40A(3) for disallowances. The Court found the Tribunal&#039;s discretionary judgment legally sound, with no substantial questions of law requiring further review.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>