<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 703 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252569</link>
    <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the transfer of cases under the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the petitioner to file objections within 30 days before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was instructed to address jurisdictional issues first, granting the petitioner the right to challenge any adverse order. The interim stay order was lifted, and each party was to bear their own costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2014 07:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367543" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 703 - SIKKIM HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252569</link>
      <description>The Court disposed of the writ petition challenging the transfer of cases under the Income Tax Act, 1961, directing the petitioner to file objections within 30 days before the Assessing Officer. The Assessing Officer was instructed to address jurisdictional issues first, granting the petitioner the right to challenge any adverse order. The interim stay order was lifted, and each party was to bear their own costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252569</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>