https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166629 Where the High Court has already heard and decided a revision petition under Section 115 CPC on merits, the subordinate court's order merges in the revisional order. A later writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging the same subordinate order should ordinarily not be entertained, because it would permit inconsistent decisions by the same High Court and defeat finality. Even apart from merger, once one High Court remedy has been invoked and exhausted, discretion should not normally be used to allow a second proceeding over the same order. The Supreme Court therefore held the subsequent writ challenge incompetent. en-us Wed, 16 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Sun, 02 Nov 2014 19:43:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166629 Where the High Court has already heard and decided a revision petition under Section 115 CPC on merits, the subordinate court's order merges in the revisional order. A later writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 challenging the same subordinate order should ordinarily not be entertained, because it would permit inconsistent decisions by the same High Court and defeat finality. Even apart from merger, once one High Court remedy has been invoked and exhausted, discretion should not normally be used to allow a second proceeding over the same order. The Supreme Court therefore held the subsequent writ challenge incompetent. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166629