<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 689 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252555</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authority&#039;s decision regarding the refund claim of Rs. 12 lakhs. The appellant successfully argued against the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment, providing evidence through a Chartered Accountant certificate and balance sheet to prove that the duty burden was not passed on. Drawing on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of such evidence, ultimately granting the appeal and providing consequential relief in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 11:09:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367505" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 689 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252555</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the lower authority&#039;s decision regarding the refund claim of Rs. 12 lakhs. The appellant successfully argued against the application of the doctrine of unjust enrichment, providing evidence through a Chartered Accountant certificate and balance sheet to prove that the duty burden was not passed on. Drawing on legal precedents, the Tribunal emphasized the importance of such evidence, ultimately granting the appeal and providing consequential relief in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>