https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252548 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the denial of CENVAT credit on CHA services for export goods based on the registered office location was legally incorrect. It found that the manufacturing unit, where the goods were produced and exported from, could claim the credit despite the registered office being elsewhere. The impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal disposed of the stay application, clarifying that the registered office's location does not bar a manufacturing unit from availing CENVAT credit on eligible input services for export goods. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:53:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252548 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, holding that the denial of CENVAT credit on CHA services for export goods based on the registered office location was legally incorrect. It found that the manufacturing unit, where the goods were produced and exported from, could claim the credit despite the registered office being elsewhere. The impugned order was set aside, and the Tribunal disposed of the stay application, clarifying that the registered office's location does not bar a manufacturing unit from availing CENVAT credit on eligible input services for export goods. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 11 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252548