<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 679 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252545</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the adjudication order disallowing Cenvat credit on outward transportation charges. The Tribunal found the order lacking in analysis and reasoning, imposing costs on the Revenue and emphasizing the necessity for better training in adjudication processes to avoid similar deficiencies in the future.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2015 15:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367495" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 679 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252545</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashing the adjudication order disallowing Cenvat credit on outward transportation charges. The Tribunal found the order lacking in analysis and reasoning, imposing costs on the Revenue and emphasizing the necessity for better training in adjudication processes to avoid similar deficiencies in the future.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252545</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>