https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252544 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It was concluded that the respondent had not passed on the differential duty to their buyers, and thus, the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply. The respondent was entitled to the refund with interest, in accordance with the law. en-us Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Oct 2014 10:38:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252544 The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)'s order, dismissing the Revenue's appeal. It was concluded that the respondent had not passed on the differential duty to their buyers, and thus, the doctrine of unjust enrichment did not apply. The respondent was entitled to the refund with interest, in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 12 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252544