https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252542 The Tribunal concluded that the disputed services qualify as 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as they are essential for the business of manufacturing the final product. However, due to insufficient documentation, the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further verification. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 5,00,000/- and comply with the authority's instructions for a final decision on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for the disputed services. en-us Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 01 Aug 2015 15:56:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252542 The Tribunal concluded that the disputed services qualify as 'input services' under Rule 2(l) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, as they are essential for the business of manufacturing the final product. However, due to insufficient documentation, the case was remanded to the adjudicating authority for further verification. The appellant was directed to make a pre-deposit of Rs. 5,00,000/- and comply with the authority's instructions for a final decision on the eligibility of Cenvat credit for the disputed services. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 18 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252542