<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 675 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252541</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision and held that the appellant must reverse the credit taken on NCCD with interest. The penalty was waived due to the legal interpretation issue. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing that simultaneous availment of duty exemption and Cenvat Credit would result in double benefits, contrary to the purpose of the NCCD levy and leading to revenue loss.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2014 15:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 675 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252541</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the lower appellate authority&#039;s decision and held that the appellant must reverse the credit taken on NCCD with interest. The penalty was waived due to the legal interpretation issue. The appeal was partly allowed, emphasizing that simultaneous availment of duty exemption and Cenvat Credit would result in double benefits, contrary to the purpose of the NCCD levy and leading to revenue loss.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252541</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>