https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166628 The Supreme Court found that the plaintiffs were licensees, not lessees, of the appellants in a dispute over market stalls. The Court ruled that the extra fees imposed by contractors were unauthorized, affirming lower court decisions. While the High Court granted an injunction against interference with possession, rent increases, and eviction, the Supreme Court set aside these reliefs, except for certain others. The appeal was partly allowed, with costs borne by the parties as incurred. en-us Mon, 03 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 11 Nov 2014 12:22:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166628 The Supreme Court found that the plaintiffs were licensees, not lessees, of the appellants in a dispute over market stalls. The Court ruled that the extra fees imposed by contractors were unauthorized, affirming lower court decisions. While the High Court granted an injunction against interference with possession, rent increases, and eviction, the Supreme Court set aside these reliefs, except for certain others. The appeal was partly allowed, with costs borne by the parties as incurred. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 03 Feb 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166628