https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166626 A composite deed was treated in substance as creating leases, not a bare licence, because the terms showed exclusive possession and tenancy-like rights over the shops and sheds. Open spaces, pavements, and passages were treated as separate physical demises rather than appurtenant accommodation, so they fell outside the rent-control protection and were liable to ejectment. Repeal of the temporary rent control law did not preserve a continuing tenant's defence in pending proceedings, as the protection was not a vested substantive right and the later saving provisions did not bar relief. The eviction decree was therefore substantially upheld. en-us Thu, 29 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Dec 2014 16:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166626 A composite deed was treated in substance as creating leases, not a bare licence, because the terms showed exclusive possession and tenancy-like rights over the shops and sheds. Open spaces, pavements, and passages were treated as separate physical demises rather than appurtenant accommodation, so they fell outside the rent-control protection and were liable to ejectment. Repeal of the temporary rent control law did not preserve a continuing tenant's defence in pending proceedings, as the protection was not a vested substantive right and the later saving provisions did not bar relief. The eviction decree was therefore substantially upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Nov 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=166626