<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 668 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252534</link>
    <description>The Tribunal invalidated proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act due to the absence of incriminating material. For the addition made under Section 68 regarding unexplained agricultural income, the Tribunal reduced the disallowance to 25% after considering evidence and a remand report. Assessment orders were quashed for years under Section 153C, and the appeal for the year assessed under Section 143(3) was partially allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2014 07:33:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367470" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 668 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252534</link>
      <description>The Tribunal invalidated proceedings initiated under Section 153C of the Income-tax Act due to the absence of incriminating material. For the addition made under Section 68 regarding unexplained agricultural income, the Tribunal reduced the disallowance to 25% after considering evidence and a remand report. Assessment orders were quashed for years under Section 153C, and the appeal for the year assessed under Section 143(3) was partially allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252534</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>