<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 661 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252527</link>
    <description>The High Court remanded the issues of unclaimed credit balances and depreciation on unused aircrafts back to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration. It ruled that the payment of Rs. 5.31 crores as lease foreclosure compensation is capital expenditure, emphasizing the significance of factual verification and adherence to legal principles in determining expenditure nature for tax purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367463" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 661 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252527</link>
      <description>The High Court remanded the issues of unclaimed credit balances and depreciation on unused aircrafts back to the Assessing Authority for fresh consideration. It ruled that the payment of Rs. 5.31 crores as lease foreclosure compensation is capital expenditure, emphasizing the significance of factual verification and adherence to legal principles in determining expenditure nature for tax purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>