https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252513 The appellant, registered as a service provider under the 'Mandap Keeper' category, was found liable for not discharging service tax retrospectively for the period before December 2007. The department's demand for service tax was upheld due to insufficient evidence of separate charges for hall usage. Additionally, service tax was demanded for amounts received towards renting of immovable property, with the appellant failing to provide evidence of separate charges. The tribunal rejected the appellant's reliance on a previous case and granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the service tax on 'renting of immovable property services.' en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:52:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252513 The appellant, registered as a service provider under the 'Mandap Keeper' category, was found liable for not discharging service tax retrospectively for the period before December 2007. The department's demand for service tax was upheld due to insufficient evidence of separate charges for hall usage. Additionally, service tax was demanded for amounts received towards renting of immovable property, with the appellant failing to provide evidence of separate charges. The tribunal rejected the appellant's reliance on a previous case and granted a waiver of pre-deposit for the service tax on 'renting of immovable property services.' Case-Laws Service Tax Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252513