<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 633 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252499</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no merit in the applicant&#039;s arguments for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules. The applicant was directed to make a pre-deposit of 25% of the duty within eight weeks, with the threat of dismissal of the Appeal for non-compliance. The balance dues would be waived upon deposit, and recovery stayed during the Appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2014 16:32:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 633 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252499</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no merit in the applicant&#039;s arguments for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalty under Rule 27 of Central Excise Rules. The applicant was directed to make a pre-deposit of 25% of the duty within eight weeks, with the threat of dismissal of the Appeal for non-compliance. The balance dues would be waived upon deposit, and recovery stayed during the Appeal&#039;s pendency.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252499</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>