<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 623 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252489</link>
    <description>The court declined to entertain the petition challenging the notice seeking to reopen assessment for Assessment Year 2007-08 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner had already appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) addressing all issues. The court criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s delay in providing reasons for the notice and disposing of objections, emphasizing the importance of timely procedures to prevent harassment and ensure compliance. Despite passing the assessment order, the court directed no coercive tax recovery proceedings until the petitioner&#039;s appeal was resolved, concluding with remarks on the Assessing Officer&#039;s conduct and dismissing the petition without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:36:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 623 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252489</link>
      <description>The court declined to entertain the petition challenging the notice seeking to reopen assessment for Assessment Year 2007-08 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as the petitioner had already appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) addressing all issues. The court criticized the Assessing Officer&#039;s delay in providing reasons for the notice and disposing of objections, emphasizing the importance of timely procedures to prevent harassment and ensure compliance. Despite passing the assessment order, the court directed no coercive tax recovery proceedings until the petitioner&#039;s appeal was resolved, concluding with remarks on the Assessing Officer&#039;s conduct and dismissing the petition without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252489</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>