<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 621 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252487</link>
    <description>The High Court determined that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not valid as the assessment order was protective, not substantive. The court emphasized that penalty proceedings cannot be based on protective assessments and cited relevant precedents. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed by the tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 08:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367381" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 621 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252487</link>
      <description>The High Court determined that the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act was not valid as the assessment order was protective, not substantive. The court emphasized that penalty proceedings cannot be based on protective assessments and cited relevant precedents. The court ruled in favor of the assessee, setting aside the penalty imposed by the tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>