<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 618 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252484</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that payments for ship charter hire charges were not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and UAE. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition for non-deduction of tax on the audit fee. The decision highlights the supremacy of DTAA provisions over the Income-tax Act when they are more advantageous to the taxpayer.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2014 07:35:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 618 - ITAT COCHIN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252484</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ruling that payments for ship charter hire charges were not taxable in India under the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and UAE. However, the Tribunal upheld the addition for non-deduction of tax on the audit fee. The decision highlights the supremacy of DTAA provisions over the Income-tax Act when they are more advantageous to the taxpayer.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252484</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>