https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252466 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order under the A.P. VAT Act, 2005, finding the petitioner ineligible for exemption under Section 4(7)(d) as a sub-contractor. The court upheld the assessment under Section 4(7)(b) and (c), rejecting the petitioner's arguments. Additionally, the court ruled that the assessment order did not contravene Article 265 or principles of natural justice. The petitioner's attempt to mislead the court by suppressing material facts led to the dismissal of the petition and imposition of exemplary costs of Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the State Government within four weeks. en-us Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252466 The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order under the A.P. VAT Act, 2005, finding the petitioner ineligible for exemption under Section 4(7)(d) as a sub-contractor. The court upheld the assessment under Section 4(7)(b) and (c), rejecting the petitioner's arguments. Additionally, the court ruled that the assessment order did not contravene Article 265 or principles of natural justice. The petitioner's attempt to mislead the court by suppressing material facts led to the dismissal of the petition and imposition of exemplary costs of Rs. 25,000 to be paid to the State Government within four weeks. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Tue, 09 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252466