<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (10) TMI 590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252456</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI acknowledged the appellant&#039;s difficulties in filing the appeal on time due to a later arising cause of action. The Tribunal restored the appeal, allowing an adjournment for the appellant&#039;s counsel. It was recognized that the appellant became aggrieved on a specific date, leading to a reconsideration of the limitation for filing the appeal. The Tribunal set aside the dismissal order and directed the ld. Commissioner to consider the appeal on its merits. The appellant was instructed to schedule a hearing promptly without adjournment. The appeal was restored and remanded for further proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 13:10:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=367333" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (10) TMI 590 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252456</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI acknowledged the appellant&#039;s difficulties in filing the appeal on time due to a later arising cause of action. The Tribunal restored the appeal, allowing an adjournment for the appellant&#039;s counsel. It was recognized that the appellant became aggrieved on a specific date, leading to a reconsideration of the limitation for filing the appeal. The Tribunal set aside the dismissal order and directed the ld. Commissioner to consider the appeal on its merits. The appellant was instructed to schedule a hearing promptly without adjournment. The appeal was restored and remanded for further proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=252456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>